EPASSA Advocacy Update- 10 June 2026

After more than six years of litigation and appeals, EPASSA’s matter against seven medical schemes was finally argued before the Council for Medical Schemes (CMS) Appeal Committee on 10 June 2026.

The matter concerns the exclusion and differential treatment of Educational Psychologists by certain medical schemes. EPASSA’s position remains that Educational Psychologists should not be excluded from reimbursement where the applicable legislative framework does not create such distinctions.

The hearing commenced with extensive argument on preliminary issues relating to jurisdiction and standing. The medical schemes argued that the CMS does not have jurisdiction to hear the matter and that EPASSA lacks the legal standing necessary to bring the complaint on behalf of Educational Psychologists and affected beneficiaries.

EPASSA’s case on these issues was presented by Advocate Nick Ferreira, assisted by our legal team. We are grateful for the exceptional preparation, expertise and commitment demonstrated by counsel and our attorneys throughout this matter. Their submissions reflected the considerable work that has gone into advancing this case over many years.

The Appeal Committee engaged extensively with both parties and, at the conclusion of proceedings, reserved its ruling on the preliminary issues. We have been advised that a decision is expected within approximately 30 business days.

While no outcome can ever be guaranteed, EPASSA remains confident in the strength of its position. Should the Appeal Committee find in our favour on the issues of jurisdiction and standing, the matter will proceed to a further hearing where the substantive discrimination issues will finally be argued on their merits.

This matter forms part of EPASSA’s broader advocacy efforts on behalf of the profession. For many years, EPASSA has engaged with regulators, policymakers and other stakeholders to protect and advance the interests of Educational Psychologists and the clients we serve. The current litigation is one example of that ongoing work.

Importantly, these efforts benefit the profession as a whole, regardless of whether an individual practitioner is currently a member of EPASSA. The outcome of this matter has the potential to affect Educational Psychologists across South Africa.

EPASSA has funded this litigation and related advocacy work primarily through membership subscriptions, without seeking special contributions from members. We remain committed to using members’ contributions responsibly and prudently.

As we continue this work, we encourage all current members to ensure that their memberships remain active and up to date. We also encourage Educational Psychologists who are not currently members to consider joining EPASSA. Every membership strengthens the Association’s ability to advocate for the profession, engage with stakeholders and pursue matters of importance to Educational Psychologists. For many practitioners, EPASSA membership may constitute a legitimate professional expense associated with maintaining and advancing their professional practice. Members are encouraged to consult their accountant or tax practitioner regarding the treatment of membership fees in their individual circumstances.

Membership support is not only an investment in EPASSA, but also an investment in the future of the profession. Those who benefit from EPASSA’s advocacy efforts have an opportunity to help sustain and strengthen that work.

We thank our members for their continued confidence, support and commitment to Educational Psychology. We will provide a further update as soon as the Appeal Committee delivers its ruling.

To sign up or renew your membership, please visit the following link: www.epassa.net

Martin Strous (Founder of EPASSA & Advocacy Liaison Officer)

Vanessa Barnes (Chairperson of EPASSA)